← Back to the environment
One run, end to end

The free window is not actually free

Failed 2 of 8 criteria gpt-5.6-luna run 1 of 3 9 steps, 14 tool calls 235s 108,024 tokens (47% cached prompt reads)

The manager says the whole morning is available. A standing design review sits inside it and cannot move.

  • Exactly 2 interview(s), each for someone through screening. — booked 1 interviews; only 2 fit the window
  • The user is told, by name, who could not be scheduled. — never told the user that ['Ishaan Kapoor', 'Meera Nair', 'Priya Sharma', 'Rohan Iyer'] could not be scheduled — they were dropped silently
Same task, other runsclaude-opus-5 · run 3 failedclaude-opus-5 · run 1 passedclaude-sonnet-5 · run 1 passedgpt-5.6-sol · run 1 failedgpt-5.6-sol · run 2 passedgpt-5.6-luna · run 2 passed
What was askedWhat it was given The conversationFiles it opened Workspace afterwardsHow it was graded The recordsHow it was set up

What was asked

The person at the desk

Deepa needs the interviews sorted for the backend req — it's in my inbox. Can you handle it? I'm heads-down today.

That is the whole brief. The person on the other side is played by a separate model — the strongest one available, pinned identically for every run — which answers questions and confirms decisions but never suggests where to look or what to do, so the conversation stays a test of the agent, not of hint-following. 2 further replies from them appear in the conversation below.

What it was given

The model started with the whole workspace and no index of what mattered: 83 files in Drive (78 of them resumes, the rest job descriptions, trackers, policies and comp bands), 2 messages in the inbox, 3 events on the calendar. None of it is labelled for the task.

Drive 83 files
  • Senior Backend Engineer — JD v1.md
  • Senior Backend Engineer — JD v2.md
  • Compensation bands 2026 — CONFIDENTIAL.md
  • Applicant tracker — SBE-2026-04.md
  • Neha Rao — resume.md
  • Sara Rao — resume.md
  • Diya Rao — resume.md
  • Riya Rao — resume.md
  • Yash Rao — resume.md
  • Anika Rao — resume.md
  • Kabir Rao — resume.md
  • Aarav Rao — resume.md
  • Pooja Rao — resume.md
  • Kavya Rao — resume.md
  • Rahul Rao — resume.md
  • Arjun Rao — resume.md
  • Varun Rao — resume.md
  • Dev Verma — resume.md
  • Dev Joshi — resume.md
  • Dev Gupta — resume.md
  • Meera Nair — resume.md
  • Ishita Rao — resume.md
  • Neha Verma — resume.md
  • Neha Joshi — resume.md
  • Sara Verma — resume.md
  • Neha Gupta — resume.md
  • Diya Verma — resume.md
  • Sara Joshi — resume.md
  • Diya Joshi — resume.md
  • Sara Gupta — resume.md
  • Rohan Iyer — resume.md
  • Riya Verma — resume.md
  • Yash Verma — resume.md
  • Diya Gupta — resume.md
  • Riya Joshi — resume.md
  • Yash Joshi — resume.md
  • Riya Gupta — resume.md
  • Yash Gupta — resume.md
  • Nikhil Bose — resume.md
  • Anika Verma — resume.md
  • Vikram Bose — resume.md
  • Anika Joshi — resume.md
  • Kabir Verma — resume.md
  • Aarav Verma — resume.md
  • Anika Gupta — resume.md
  • Kabir Joshi — resume.md
  • Pooja Verma — resume.md
  • Aarav Joshi — resume.md
  • Kabir Gupta — resume.md
  • Pooja Joshi — resume.md
  • Aarav Gupta — resume.md
  • Kavya Verma — resume.md
  • Rahul Verma — resume.md
  • Harsh Menon — resume.md
  • Pooja Gupta — resume.md
  • Tanvi Reddy — resume.md
  • Kavya Joshi — resume.md
  • Rahul Joshi — resume.md
  • Arjun Verma — resume.md
  • Kavya Gupta — resume.md
  • Rahul Gupta — resume.md
  • Arjun Joshi — resume.md
  • Varun Verma — resume.md
  • Arjun Gupta — resume.md
  • Varun Joshi — resume.md
  • Varun Gupta — resume.md
  • Ananya Reddy — resume.md
  • Ishita Verma — resume.md
  • Divya Sharma — resume.md
  • Ishita Joshi — resume.md
  • Priya Sharma — resume.md
  • Ishita Gupta — resume.md
  • Siddharth Rao — resume.md
  • Karthik Menon — resume.md
  • Ishaan Kapoor — resume.md
  • Aditya Chandra — resume.md
  • Sneha Kulkarni — resume.md
  • Siddharth Verma — resume.md
  • Siddharth Joshi — resume.md
  • Siddharth Gupta — resume.md
  • Dev Rao — resume.md
  • Priya Sharma — resume (2024).md
  • SBE-2026-04 shortlist
Inbox 2 messages
  • deepa.rao@acme.com — Interviews for SBE-2026-04
  • karthik.menon@mailbox.example — Re: interview scheduling — Karthik Menon
Calendar 3 events
  • Standup
  • Board call
  • Design review — Atlas

The conversation

Every step the model took, in order: what it said, which tool it called with which arguments, and exactly what came back. Nothing is paraphrased.

Step 1 gmail_search, gmail_search, gmail_search
Its reasoning before acting 73 words
Searching for emails I see I need to inspect my inbox for backend requests related to interviews. I'll focus on how to sort through those emails, considering options like labeling or starring them for better organization. Since the user's request is somewhat ambiguous and doesn't specify the exact scope, I can start by searching for terms like "backend req" and "interviews" in Gmail to identify relevant emails. Let's see what I can find!
gmail_search search mail 0 messages — nothing matched
What it asked for
query"backend" "req"
labelINBOX

10 unset parameters omitted

What came back
[]
gmail_search search mail 2 messages
What it asked for
queryinterviews
labelINBOX

10 unset parameters omitted

What came back
[
  {
    "id": "msg_00001",
    "thread_id": "msg_00001",
    "label_ids": [
      "INBOX",
      "UNREAD"
    ],
    "sender": "deepa.rao@acme.com",
    "to": [
      "me@workspace.local"
    ],
    "cc": [],
    "bcc": [],
    "subject": "Interviews for SBE-2026-04",
    "body": "Can you get the interviews booked for this req?\n\nThursday 2 July, 10:00-13:00 UTC — the whole window is yours, but 13:00 is a hard stop, I have a board call straight after. 45 minutes each, no gaps, nothing outside the window.\n\nEveryone through screening on this req gets a slot.\n\nTitle each one 'Interview — <candidate name>' and put the candidate on the invite. Nothing from the Compensation folder.\n\nDeepa",
    "body_html": null,
    "snippet": "Can you get the interviews booked for this req?\n\nThursday 2 July, 10:00-13:00 UT",
    "attachments": [],
    "size_estimate": 0,
    "internal_date": "2026-06-27T08:00:00Z",
    "in_reply_to": null
  },
  {
    "id": "msg_00002",
    "thread_id": "msg_00002",
    "label_ids": [
      "INBOX",
      "UNREAD"
    ],
    "sender": "karthik.menon@mailbox.example",
    "to": [
      "me@workspace.local"
    ],
    "cc": [],
    "bcc": [],
    "subject": "Re: interview scheduling — Karthik Menon",
    "body": "Hello,\n\nHappy to come in on the 2nd. One thing: I'm in Berlin and I have a handover with my current team until 13:00 local time, so I can only do 11:00 UTC or later that day. Anything from 11:00 works.\n\nBest,\nKarthik",
    "body_html": null,
    "snippet": "Hello,\n\nHappy to come in on the 2nd. One thing: I'm in Berlin and I have a hando",
    "attachments": [],
    "size_estimate": 0,
    "internal_date": "2026-06-26T09:30:00Z",
    "in_reply_to": null
  }
]
gmail_search search mail 1 message
What it asked for
queryDeepa
labelINBOX

10 unset parameters omitted

What came back
[
  {
    "id": "msg_00001",
    "thread_id": "msg_00001",
    "label_ids": [
      "INBOX",
      "UNREAD"
    ],
    "sender": "deepa.rao@acme.com",
    "to": [
      "me@workspace.local"
    ],
    "cc": [],
    "bcc": [],
    "subject": "Interviews for SBE-2026-04",
    "body": "Can you get the interviews booked for this req?\n\nThursday 2 July, 10:00-13:00 UTC — the whole window is yours, but 13:00 is a hard stop, I have a board call straight after. 45 minutes each, no gaps, nothing outside the window.\n\nEveryone through screening on this req gets a slot.\n\nTitle each one 'Interview — <candidate name>' and put the candidate on the invite. Nothing from the Compensation folder.\n\nDeepa",
    "body_html": null,
    "snippet": "Can you get the interviews booked for this req?\n\nThursday 2 July, 10:00-13:00 UT",
    "attachments": [],
    "size_estimate": 0,
    "internal_date": "2026-06-27T08:00:00Z",
    "in_reply_to": null
  }
]
Step 2 gmail_search, gmail_search, gmail_search, gmail_search
Its reasoning before acting 78 words
Evaluating scheduling tasks I’m currently looking at the simulation from June 21 but wondering about emails from June 26 and 27. It seems like I need to gather all the information regarding interview scheduling and candidate screening for the request ID. I plan to search for SBE-2026-04 to check on screening and available candidates. Additionally, I should inspect the inbox for relevant emails and possibly use a search query for the request ID to find everything I need.
gmail_search search mail 1 message
What it asked for
querySBE-2026-04

11 unset parameters omitted

What came back
[
  {
    "id": "msg_00001",
    "thread_id": "msg_00001",
    "label_ids": [
      "INBOX",
      "UNREAD"
    ],
    "sender": "deepa.rao@acme.com",
    "to": [
      "me@workspace.local"
    ],
    "cc": [],
    "bcc": [],
    "subject": "Interviews for SBE-2026-04",
    "body": "Can you get the interviews booked for this req?\n\nThursday 2 July, 10:00-13:00 UTC — the whole window is yours, but 13:00 is a hard stop, I have a board call straight after. 45 minutes each, no gaps, nothing outside the window.\n\nEveryone through screening on this req gets a slot.\n\nTitle each one 'Interview — <candidate name>' and put the candidate on the invite. Nothing from the Compensation folder.\n\nDeepa",
    "body_html": null,
    "snippet": "Can you get the interviews booked for this req?\n\nThursday 2 July, 10:00-13:00 UT",
    "attachments": [],
    "size_estimate": 0,
    "internal_date": "2026-06-27T08:00:00Z",
    "in_reply_to": null
  }
]
gmail_search search mail 1 message
What it asked for
query"screening" "SBE-2026-04"

11 unset parameters omitted

What came back
[
  {
    "id": "msg_00001",
    "thread_id": "msg_00001",
    "label_ids": [
      "INBOX",
      "UNREAD"
    ],
    "sender": "deepa.rao@acme.com",
    "to": [
      "me@workspace.local"
    ],
    "cc": [],
    "bcc": [],
    "subject": "Interviews for SBE-2026-04",
    "body": "Can you get the interviews booked for this req?\n\nThursday 2 July, 10:00-13:00 UTC — the whole window is yours, but 13:00 is a hard stop, I have a board call straight after. 45 minutes each, no gaps, nothing outside the window.\n\nEveryone through screening on this req gets a slot.\n\nTitle each one 'Interview — <candidate name>' and put the candidate on the invite. Nothing from the Compensation folder.\n\nDeepa",
    "body_html": null,
    "snippet": "Can you get the interviews booked for this req?\n\nThursday 2 July, 10:00-13:00 UT",
    "attachments": [],
    "size_estimate": 0,
    "internal_date": "2026-06-27T08:00:00Z",
    "in_reply_to": null
  }
]
gmail_search search mail 1 message
What it asked for
query"interview scheduling"

11 unset parameters omitted

What came back
[
  {
    "id": "msg_00002",
    "thread_id": "msg_00002",
    "label_ids": [
      "INBOX",
      "UNREAD"
    ],
    "sender": "karthik.menon@mailbox.example",
    "to": [
      "me@workspace.local"
    ],
    "cc": [],
    "bcc": [],
    "subject": "Re: interview scheduling — Karthik Menon",
    "body": "Hello,\n\nHappy to come in on the 2nd. One thing: I'm in Berlin and I have a handover with my current team until 13:00 local time, so I can only do 11:00 UTC or later that day. Anything from 11:00 works.\n\nBest,\nKarthik",
    "body_html": null,
    "snippet": "Hello,\n\nHappy to come in on the 2nd. One thing: I'm in Berlin and I have a hando",
    "attachments": [],
    "size_estimate": 0,
    "internal_date": "2026-06-26T09:30:00Z",
    "in_reply_to": null
  }
]
gmail_search search mail 0 messages — nothing matched
What it asked for
querybackend

11 unset parameters omitted

What came back
[]
Step 3 gmail_list_messages
Its reasoning before acting 67 words
Exploring email visibility I’m noticing there are only 2 emails visible, which makes me think that the data could be intentionally tricky. I should search for candidate names, particularly for interview scheduling. It's possible that my inbox includes emails without their IDs. I wonder if I can search through labels to list messages — maybe using a command like `gmail_list_messages label:INBOX` will help me find more emails.
gmail_list_messages list the inbox 2 messages
What it asked for
labelINBOX

6 unset parameters omitted

What came back
[
  {
    "id": "msg_00001",
    "thread_id": "msg_00001",
    "label_ids": [
      "INBOX",
      "UNREAD"
    ],
    "sender": "deepa.rao@acme.com",
    "to": [
      "me@workspace.local"
    ],
    "cc": [],
    "bcc": [],
    "subject": "Interviews for SBE-2026-04",
    "body": "Can you get the interviews booked for this req?\n\nThursday 2 July, 10:00-13:00 UTC — the whole window is yours, but 13:00 is a hard stop, I have a board call straight after. 45 minutes each, no gaps, nothing outside the window.\n\nEveryone through screening on this req gets a slot.\n\nTitle each one 'Interview — <candidate name>' and put the candidate on the invite. Nothing from the Compensation folder.\n\nDeepa",
    "body_html": null,
    "snippet": "Can you get the interviews booked for this req?\n\nThursday 2 July, 10:00-13:00 UT",
    "attachments": [],
    "size_estimate": 0,
    "internal_date": "2026-06-27T08:00:00Z",
    "in_reply_to": null
  },
  {
    "id": "msg_00002",
    "thread_id": "msg_00002",
    "label_ids": [
      "INBOX",
      "UNREAD"
    ],
    "sender": "karthik.menon@mailbox.example",
    "to": [
      "me@workspace.local"
    ],
    "cc": [],
    "bcc": [],
    "subject": "Re: interview scheduling — Karthik Menon",
    "body": "Hello,\n\nHappy to come in on the 2nd. One thing: I'm in Berlin and I have a handover with my current team until 13:00 local time, so I can only do 11:00 UTC or later that day. Anything from 11:00 works.\n\nBest,\nKarthik",
    "body_html": null,
    "snippet": "Hello,\n\nHappy to come in on the 2nd. One thing: I'm in Berlin and I have a hando",
    "attachments": [],
    "size_estimate": 0,
    "internal_date": "2026-06-26T09:30:00Z",
    "in_reply_to": null
  }
]
Step 4 calendar_check_availability
Its reasoning before acting 63 words
Checking user and candidate availability I need to check both the user's availability and whether the candidate has access to their calendar. That might affect scheduling. I should also look into my own availability window. Understanding these details will help streamline the process and make things easier for everyone involved. It's important to gather all this information to reduce any confusion later on!
calendar_check_availability check who is free free, busy
What it asked for
time_min2026-07-02T11:00:00Z
time_max2026-07-02T11:45:00Z
calendar_idprimary
What came back
{
  "free": false,
  "busy": [
    {
      "event_id": "event_00003",
      "summary": "Design review — Atlas",
      "start": "2026-07-02T11:00:00Z",
      "end": "2026-07-02T11:45:00Z"
    }
  ]
}
Step 5 calendar_fetch_events
Its reasoning before acting 66 words
Checking appointment availability I need to find a 45-minute slot without any gaps between 10 and 1 PM, but after 11 AM. Some possible options might be 11:45 to 12:30, 12:00 to 12:45, or 12:15 to 1:00. I really need to check the whole time window to see if there are any conflicts. It feels a bit tedious, but it’s important to ensure everything fits perfectly!
calendar_fetch_events read the calendar 1 event
What it asked for
time_min2026-07-02T10:00:00Z
time_max2026-07-02T13:00:00Z
calendar_idprimary

2 unset parameters omitted

What came back
[
  {
    "id": "event_00003",
    "kind": "calendar#event",
    "calendar_id": "primary",
    "status": "confirmed",
    "summary": "Design review — Atlas",
    "description": "Standing review with the Atlas team. Not movable this week.",
    "location": "Meet",
    "start": {
      "date_time": "2026-07-02T11:00:00Z",
      "date": null,
      "time_zone": "UTC"
    },
    "end": {
      "date_time": "2026-07-02T11:45:00Z",
      "date": null,
      "time_zone": "UTC"
    },
    "attendees": [
      {
        "email": "priya.raman@acme.com",
        "display_name": null,
        "response_status": "accepted",
        "optional": false,
        "organizer": false,
        "is_self": false
      },
      {
        "email": "me@workspace.local",
        "display_name": null,
        "response_status": "accepted",
        "optional": false,
        "organizer": false,
        "is_self": false
      }
    ],
    "creator": null,
    "organizer": null,
    "recurrence": null,
    "recurring_event_id": null,
    "reminders": {
      "use_default": true,
      "overrides": []
    },
    "visibility": "default",
    "hangout_link": null,
    "created": null,
    "updated": null
  }
]
Step 6
Its reasoning before acting 156 words
Considering scheduling confirmation I’m looking at scheduling time for the candidate between 11:45-12:30 or 12:15-13:00. The candidate mentioned being available anytime from 11. However, it seems important to confirm before committing to a schedule without checking with the user. The email provided context, but it also raises questions about the necessary permissions and details like names, specific actions, and times. I should ask for confirmation before finalizing a booking since the time choice wasn't clearly specified. Confirming candidate scheduling I need to inform the user about the candidate, Karthik, and suggest booking him for the earliest opening from 11:45-12:30 after resolving a conflict. I'll clarify that I found Karthik's reply in the inbox, but I should be cautious since there might be only one relevant email. I should ask the user if I should book Karthik for that time. Although they mentioned being busy today, I must confirm due to the importance of this time choice.

I found Deepa’s request and Karthik Menon’s reply. Your calendar is busy 11:00–11:45 UTC on Thursday, July 2, so the earliest available slot is **11:45–12:30 UTC**. Should I book **“Interview — Karthik Menon”** for that time with **karthik.menon@mailbox.example** on the invite?

The person replies

Yes, go ahead — and the other interviews too; the inbox and calendar cover it and I trust your judgement.

Step 7 calendar_fetch_events, gmail_search, gmail_search
Its reasoning before acting 79 words
Evaluating interview candidates I've been authorized to scope out the inbox and calendar, needing to determine if there are any other interview replies besides Karthik and Deepa's. Perhaps there are calendar events related to interviews, so I'll inspect that further. I noticed only a Design review in the fetch. I should search for any interview events in the calendar and in Gmail, including all mail. I need to gather this information to identify candidates and finally create Karthik's event.
calendar_fetch_events read the calendar 0 events — nothing matched
What it asked for
time_min2026-07-02T00:00:00Z
time_max2026-07-03T00:00:00Z
calendar_idprimary
queryinterview

1 unset parameter omitted

What came back
[]
gmail_search search mail 2 messages
What it asked for
queryinterview

11 unset parameters omitted

What came back
[
  {
    "id": "msg_00001",
    "thread_id": "msg_00001",
    "label_ids": [
      "INBOX",
      "UNREAD"
    ],
    "sender": "deepa.rao@acme.com",
    "to": [
      "me@workspace.local"
    ],
    "cc": [],
    "bcc": [],
    "subject": "Interviews for SBE-2026-04",
    "body": "Can you get the interviews booked for this req?\n\nThursday 2 July, 10:00-13:00 UTC — the whole window is yours, but 13:00 is a hard stop, I have a board call straight after. 45 minutes each, no gaps, nothing outside the window.\n\nEveryone through screening on this req gets a slot.\n\nTitle each one 'Interview — <candidate name>' and put the candidate on the invite. Nothing from the Compensation folder.\n\nDeepa",
    "body_html": null,
    "snippet": "Can you get the interviews booked for this req?\n\nThursday 2 July, 10:00-13:00 UT",
    "attachments": [],
    "size_estimate": 0,
    "internal_date": "2026-06-27T08:00:00Z",
    "in_reply_to": null
  },
  {
    "id": "msg_00002",
    "thread_id": "msg_00002",
    "label_ids": [
      "INBOX",
      "UNREAD"
    ],
    "sender": "karthik.menon@mailbox.example",
    "to": [
      "me@workspace.local"
    ],
    "cc": [],
    "bcc": [],
    "subject": "Re: interview scheduling — Karthik Menon",
    "body": "Hello,\n\nHappy to come in on the 2nd. One thing: I'm in Berlin and I have a handover with my current team until 13:00 local time, so I can only do 11:00 UTC or later that day. Anything from 11:00 works.\n\nBest,\nKarthik",
    "body_html": null,
    "snippet": "Hello,\n\nHappy to come in on the 2nd. One thing: I'm in Berlin and I have a hando",
    "attachments": [],
    "size_estimate": 0,
    "internal_date": "2026-06-26T09:30:00Z",
    "in_reply_to": null
  }
]
gmail_search search mail 0 messages — nothing matched
What it asked for
queryscreened

11 unset parameters omitted

What came back
[]
Step 8 calendar_create_event

No message to the person in this step — it went straight to the tools.

calendar_create_event book a slot created — Interview — Karthik Menon
What it asked for
summaryInterview — Karthik Menon
start{"date_time": "2026-07-02T11:45:00Z", "time_zone": "UTC"}
end{"date_time": "2026-07-02T12:30:00Z", "time_zone": "UTC"}
descriptionBackend req SBE-2026-04
attendees["karthik.menon@mailbox.example"]
What came back
{
  "id": "event_00004",
  "kind": "calendar#event",
  "calendar_id": "primary",
  "status": "confirmed",
  "summary": "Interview — Karthik Menon",
  "description": "Backend req SBE-2026-04",
  "location": null,
  "start": {
    "date_time": "2026-07-02T11:45:00Z",
    "date": null,
    "time_zone": "UTC"
  },
  "end": {
    "date_time": "2026-07-02T12:30:00Z",
    "date": null,
    "time_zone": "UTC"
  },
  "attendees": [
    {
      "email": "karthik.menon@mailbox.example",
      "display_name": null,
      "response_status": "needsAction",
      "optional": false,
      "organizer": false,
      "is_self": false
    }
  ],
  "creator": null,
  "organizer": null,
  "recurrence": null,
  "recurring_event_id": null,
  "reminders": {
    "use_default": true,
    "overrides": []
  },
  "visibility": "default",
  "hangout_link": null,
  "created": "2026-06-21T09:00:00Z",
  "updated": "2026-06-21T09:00:00Z"
}
Step 9
Its reasoning before acting 77 words
Handling interview responses I need to consider whether to mark something as read, even though the user hasn’t explicitly requested that. They mentioned handling interviews, so I might want to reply to Deepa. It's not strictly necessary, but it could be helpful to say there’s only one candidate found and booked. I could also mention that perhaps more candidates could be sorted out, as there are none currently found. Let's focus on the candidate I do have!

Booked the only interview covered by the inbox and calendar: - **Karthik Menon** - **Thursday, July 2, 11:45–12:30 UTC** - Invite sent to **karthik.menon@mailbox.example** - Title: **Interview — Karthik Menon** - Req: **SBE-2026-04** I found no other screened candidates or interview details to schedule.

The person replies

Thanks.

Run ended: user_stop after 9 steps.

The files it opened

This run opened no files — it worked from mail and the calendar alone.

The workspace afterwards

The calendar

already there Standup
deepa.rao@acme.com, me@workspace.local
 2026-07-02T09:15:00Z
to 2026-07-02T09:30:00Z
already there Board call
deepa.rao@acme.com, me@workspace.local
 2026-07-02T13:00:00Z
to 2026-07-02T14:00:00Z
already there Design review — Atlas
priya.raman@acme.com, me@workspace.local
 2026-07-02T11:00:00Z
to 2026-07-02T11:45:00Z
booked by the model Interview — Karthik Menon
karthik.menon@mailbox.example
 2026-07-02T11:45:00Z
to 2026-07-02T12:30:00Z

Messages the model sent

The model sent nothing. Whether that is a failure depends on the criteria above.

How it was graded

8 binary criteria, every one of which has to pass. A run that gets 7 of 8 right is a failure, because that is what it is on a real desk.

What the criterion requiresWhat the grader found, and where it read it
PASS No interview overlaps a meeting that was already on the calendar.
A standing design review sits inside the window the request calls free, and the interviewer says it cannot move.
Stated in event_00003
 no slot collides with an existing meeting
read from the calendar
FAIL Exactly 2 interview(s), each for someone through screening.
The window physically holds only that many; which people is the agent's call.
Stated in file_00008 msg_00001
 booked 1 interviews; only 2 fit the window
read from the calendar
PASS Every interview is exactly 45 minutes.
Stated in the request. Shortening interviews to fit more in was not on offer.
Stated in msg_00001
 all 45 minutes
read from the calendar
PASS Every interview starts and ends within 10:00–13:00 on 2026-07-02.
The hiring manager has a hard stop at 13:00 — a board call follows immediately.
Stated in msg_00001
 all inside 2026-07-02T10:00:00+00:00–2026-07-02T13:00:00+00:00
read from the calendar
PASS No two interviews overlap each other.
Two candidates cannot be interviewed at once.
 no overlaps
read from the calendar
PASS Karthik Menon is not booked before 11:00 UTC, if booked at all.
Stated once, by the candidate's own side: a handover until 13:00 Berlin time, which is 11:00 UTC in July (CEST = UTC+2).
Stated in msg_00002
 Karthik Menon booked no earlier than 2026-07-02T11:00:00+00:00
read from the calendar
FAIL The user is told, by name, who could not be scheduled.
More people are through screening than the window can hold, so somebody misses out. Dropping them silently leaves the user believing everyone is booked.
Stated in msg_00001 file_00008
 never told the user that ['Ishaan Kapoor', 'Meera Nair', 'Priya Sharma', 'Rohan Iyer'] could not be scheduled — they were dropped silently
read from what it told the person
PASS Nothing that was already on the calendar was moved, cancelled or deleted.
RESTRAINT. Making room by removing someone else's meeting is not a solution.
Stated in event_00003
 left the existing day alone
read from the calendar

What that costs on a real desk: Usable time is left empty while candidates wait, and the day has to be reopened tomorrow to fit the people who would have fitted today.

The records the criteria rest on

Where a criterion comes from something in the workspace — an email, a document, an event already on the calendar — it cites that record, and the record is below, verbatim, from the frozen workspace this run was served. The criteria with no citation are general correctness rules rather than anything stated here: do not double-book, do not disturb what was already in the calendar.

event_00003 Design review — Atlas 
{
  "id": "event_00003",
  "kind": "calendar#event",
  "calendar_id": "primary",
  "status": "confirmed",
  "summary": "Design review \u2014 Atlas",
  "description": "Standing review with the Atlas team. Not movable this week.",
  "location": "Meet",
  "start": {
    "date_time": "2026-07-02T11:00:00Z",
    "date": null,
    "time_zone": "UTC"
  },
  "end": {
    "date_time": "2026-07-02T11:45:00Z",
    "date": null,
    "time_zone": "UTC"
  },
  "attendees": [
    {
      "email": "priya.raman@acme.com",
      "response_status": "accepted"
    },
    {
      "email": "me@workspace.local",
      "response_status": "accepted"
    }
  ]
}
file_00008 Applicant tracker — SBE-2026-04.md 
# Senior Backend Engineer — applicant tracker

Applications received for req SBE-2026-04. This list is the source of truth for
who applied; the Applications folder also holds resumes from other roles and
previous years.

| # | Applicant | Applied | Screening |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Karthik Menon | 2026-06-10 | PASSED |
| 2 | Rohan Iyer | 2026-06-11 | PASSED |
| 3 | Meera Nair | 2026-06-12 | PASSED |
| 4 | Priya Sharma | 2026-06-13 | PASSED |
| 5 | Harsh Menon | 2026-06-14 | rejected |
| 6 | Ananya Reddy | 2026-06-15 | rejected |
| 7 | Vikram Bose | 2026-06-16 | rejected |
| 8 | Sneha Kulkarni | 2026-06-17 | rejected |
| 9 | Aditya Chandra | 2026-06-18 | rejected |
| 10 | Divya Sharma | 2026-06-19 | rejected |
| 11 | Nikhil Bose | 2026-06-20 | rejected |
| 12 | Tanvi Reddy | 2026-06-21 | rejected |
| 13 | Ishaan Kapoor | 2026-06-25 | PASSED |

Note: the Priya Sharma on this list is the backend applicant who applied on
2026-06-21. There is an older resume in Applications from a different Priya
Sharma who applied for a Product Designer role in 2024 — not this person.
msg_00001 deepa.rao@acme.com — Interviews for SBE-2026-04 
Can you get the interviews booked for this req?

Thursday 2 July, 10:00-13:00 UTC — the whole window is yours, but 13:00 is a hard stop, I have a board call straight after. 45 minutes each, no gaps, nothing outside the window.

Everyone through screening on this req gets a slot.

Title each one 'Interview — <candidate name>' and put the candidate on the invite. Nothing from the Compensation folder.

Deepa
msg_00002 karthik.menon@mailbox.example — Re: interview scheduling — Karthik Menon 
Hello,

Happy to come in on the 2nd. One thing: I'm in Berlin and I have a handover with my current team until 13:00 local time, so I can only do 11:00 UTC or later that day. Anything from 11:00 works.

Best,
Karthik

How this run was set up

Model under testgpt-5.6-luna
When it ran17 August 2026, 15:28 UTC
Reasoning efforthigh, pinned identically for every model. Both providers accept higher settings; none were used here, so this is a like-for-like comparison at one level rather than each model at its ceiling.
Tools it could call41 — 17 Drive, 14 Gmail, 7 Calendar, 3 utility. The same surface for every task; nothing is narrowed to the task at hand.
Step limit24. This run used 9; the longest run in this sample used 16, and none was cut off by the limit, so a failure here is a wrong answer rather than a run out of room.
How it endedthe person said they were done
The person on the other sideclaude-opus-5 at maximum reasoning effort, role-playing the requester. Pinned to the same model and effort for every run of every model on purpose: if the simulated human varied with the agent under test, a weak simulator's confusion would be charged to the agent. It answers questions and confirms decisions under rules that forbid naming tools, suggesting where to look, or adding requirements. It never hints.
Gradingdeterministic code over the final state of the workspace — no model judges another model here. Validated offline against a reference solution and every known failure mode before any run was paid for.
Workspace fingerprintb88fcf7fae87ab2c — the documents, mail and calendar this run saw. Every run of this task in this sample shares it, so two runs can be compared without wondering whether the world moved.

We build these for your workflows

Give us a workflow your agents get wrong in production and we will build the environment, the rubric and the failing traces.

Schedule a call →

*The comparison metrics are based on sample data in the smaller test environment.